lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:16:52 +0000
From:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
To:	Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next (v3) 1/3] MIPS: bcm963xx: Add Broadcom BCM963xx
 board nvram data structure

On 11/12/15 23:29, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu> wrote:
>> On 11/12/15 22:02, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu> wrote:
>>>> Broadcom BCM963xx boards have multiple nvram variants across different
>>>> SoCs with additional checksum fields added whenever the size of the
>>>> nvram was extended.
>>>>
>>>> Add this structure as a header file so that multiple drivers and userspace
>>>> can use it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
>>>> ---
>>>> v3: Fix includes/type names, add comments explaining the nvram struct.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Use external struct bcm963xx_nvram definition for bcm963268part.
...
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bcm963xx_nvram.h b/include/uapi/linux/bcm963xx_nvram.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..2dcb307
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bcm963xx_nvram.h
>>>
>>> Why uapi? The nvram layout isn't really enforced to be that way, and
>>> at least Huawei uses a modified one on some devices (in case you
>>> wondered why bcm63xx doesn't fail a crc32-"broken" one), so IMHO it
>>> should be kept for in-kernel use only.
>>
>> Because Florian suggested include/uapi/linux/bcm963xx_nvram.h; I could
>> move it to include/linux/ instead if this is preferred.
...
>>>> + * Do not use the __reserved fields, especially not as an offset for CRC
>>>> + * calculations (use BCM963XX_NVRAM_*_SIZE instead). These may be removed or
>>>> + * repositioned.
> 
> Because I just saw that: Nobody will read that. ;p

I'll move this to include/linux/bcm963xx_nvram.h and omit the linux-api
mailing list when I next send the patch series.

-- 
Simon Arlott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ