linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: free swap cache aggressively if memcg swap is full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151212161856.GA28521@esperanza>
Date:	Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:18:56 +0300
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: free swap cache aggressively if memcg swap is
 full

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:33:58PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:39:19PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > Swap cache pages are freed aggressively if swap is nearly full (>50%
> > currently), because otherwise we are likely to stop scanning anonymous
> > when we near the swap limit even if there is plenty of freeable swap
> > cache pages. We should follow the same trend in case of memory cgroup,
> > which has its own swap limit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> 
> One note:
> 
> > @@ -5839,6 +5839,29 @@ long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >  	return nr_swap_pages;
> >  }
> >  
> > +bool mem_cgroup_swap_full(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > +
> > +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> > +
> > +	if (vm_swap_full())
> > +		return true;
> > +	if (!do_swap_account || !PageSwapCache(page))
> > +		return false;
> 
> The callers establish PageSwapCache() under the page lock, which makes
> sense since they only inquire about the swap state when deciding what
> to do with a swapcache page at hand. So this check seems unnecessary.

Yeah, you're right, we don't need it here. Will remove it in v2.

Besides, I think I should have inserted cgroup_subsys_on_dflt check in
this function so that it wouldn't check memcg->swap limit in case the
legacy hierarchy is used. Will do.

Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/