linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf, tools: Disable branch flags/cycles for --callgraph lbr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:12:24 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	acme@...nel.org
Cc:	jolsa@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf, tools: Disable branch flags/cycles for --callgraph lbr

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

[The kernel patch needed for this is in tip now
(b16a5b52eb9 perf/x86: Add option to disable ...)
So this user tools patch to make use of it should be merged now]

Automatically disable collecting branch flags and cycles with
--call-graph lbr. This allows avoiding a bunch of extra MSR
reads in the PMI on Skylake.

When the kernel doesn't support the new flags they are automatically
cleared in the fallback code.

v2: Switch to use branch_sample_type instead of sample_type.
Adjust description.
Fix the fallback logic.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 47f0330..544e440 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static struct {
 	bool cloexec;
 	bool clockid;
 	bool clockid_wrong;
+	bool lbr_flags;
 } perf_missing_features;
 
 static clockid_t clockid;
@@ -574,7 +575,9 @@ perf_evsel__config_callgraph(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
 			} else {
 				perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
 				attr->branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER |
-							PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK;
+							PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK |
+							PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES |
+							PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
 			}
 		} else
 			 pr_warning("Cannot use LBR callstack with branch stack. "
@@ -1337,6 +1340,9 @@ fallback_missing_features:
 		evsel->attr.mmap2 = 0;
 	if (perf_missing_features.exclude_guest)
 		evsel->attr.exclude_guest = evsel->attr.exclude_host = 0;
+	if (perf_missing_features.lbr_flags)
+		evsel->attr.branch_sample_type &= ~(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS |
+				     PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES);
 retry_sample_id:
 	if (perf_missing_features.sample_id_all)
 		evsel->attr.sample_id_all = 0;
@@ -1455,6 +1461,12 @@ try_fallback:
 	} else if (!perf_missing_features.sample_id_all) {
 		perf_missing_features.sample_id_all = true;
 		goto retry_sample_id;
+	} else if (!perf_missing_features.lbr_flags &&
+			(evsel->attr.branch_sample_type &
+			 (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES |
+			  PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS))) {
+		perf_missing_features.lbr_flags = true;
+		goto fallback_missing_features;
 	}
 
 out_close:
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/