[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdR7cx5zXEqfvjpXT5EYKsirvwpW-umNi8JCx_e-NAUgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:46:22 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] lib/vsprintf.c: expand field_width to 24 bits
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:30:04 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>
>> I didn't find a BUILD_BUG/compiletime_assertion/... which would work
>> outside function context, so for now I just open-coded it.
>>
>
> It comes up occasionally. It would be better to create one.
>
>> +extern char __check_printf_spec[1-2*(sizeof(struct printf_spec) != 8)];
>
> Maybe something like
>
> /*
> * Description goes here
> */
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON_STATIC(unique_id, expr) \
> typedef char unique_id[1-2*(expr)];
Yeah, it would be really nice to get rid of unique_id, though I have
no idea how to achieve.
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON_STATIC(__check_printf_spec, sizeof(struct printf_spec) != 8);
>
> ("static" seems the wrong term, but what is the correct term for
> "outside of functions"?)
Just _EXT? Or _VAR?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists