[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfdGJtDia5oqVWzJ_pWKm=-BrHThN_9Uz8QU2c9ZT5PJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 03:13:46 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove unneeded "0x" when %pa formatting is used.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Dmitry Krivenok
<krivenok.dmitry@...il.com> wrote:
>>> if (size > max_size) {
>>> dev_err(pcie->dev,
>>> - "res size 0x%pap exceeds max supported size 0x%llx\n",
>>> + "res size %pap exceeds max supported size 0x%llx\n",
>>
>> %pa also works.
>>
>
> Yes, but AFAIK %pap and %pa are identical (see address_val() in lib/vsprintf.c),
> so I'm not sure I understand your comment.
>
> Did you mean that %pa should be used instead of %pap?
> I see that %pa is used much more often than %pap, but I didn't find any
> evidence that %pap is deprecated.
+Rasmus.
No, it's not, but it explicitly for phys_addr_t (it might be nice to
to have %par, for example for explicitly shown that is for
resource_size_t, Rasmus?).
For my opinion for resources better to use %pa for now, though %pap
will work as well.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists