linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: detect leading * in NULL comparison check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:02:54 -0500
From:	"S. Gilles" <sgilles@...h.umd.edu>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	"S. Gilles" <sgilles@...h.umd.edu>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: detect leading * in NULL comparison check

On 2015-12-13T12:49:01, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:59 -0500, S. Gilles wrote:
> > Prevent checkpatch.pl from emitting messages like
> > 
> >   CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!rx_p"
> >   #51: FILE: drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_ring.c:51:
> >   +       if (*rx_p == NULL) {
> > 
> > by checking for leading * characters in the comparison value.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: S. Gilles <sgilles@...h.umd.edu>
> > ---
> > 
> > I've run this through everything in staging/ as a test, it seems to
> > work okay.
> 
> This wouldn't work with
> 
> 	* foo == NULL;
> 
> but there don't seem to be any in the kernel source.

Some other stuff like

	*(foo) == NULL

won't be caught as well, but in such false negative cases, other style
conventions would have to be violated anyway. I'm not sure how strong
that argument is.

-- 
S. Gilles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/