[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151214011221.GA9568@danjae.kornet>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:12:21 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/16] perf top: Add multi-thread support (v1)
Hi David and Ingo,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:01:31AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/11/15 1:11 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >>IIRC David said that thread per cpu seems too much especially on a large system
> >>(like ~1024 cpu). [...]
> >
> >Too much in what fashion? For recording I think it's the fastest, most natural
> >model - anything else will create cache line bounces.
>
> The intrusiveness of perf on the system under observation. I understand
> there are a lot of factors that go into it.
So what would be the sane default? Do you have any other suggestion?
If there's no opinion, I'll follow Ingo's..
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists