lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151214081958.GA21686@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 09:19:58 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix misleading indentation issues in perf


* Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:

> perf doesn't build with gcc-6 because of several misleading-indentation
> warnings, e.g.:
> 
> arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c: In function ‘spawn’:
> arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c:21:3: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
>    sleep(5);
>    ^~~~~
> 
> arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c:20:2: note: ...this ‘while’ clause, but it is not
>   while(1);
>   ^~~~~

Nice warnings!

> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c
> index d28c1b6a3b54..fa5d17af88b7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static pid_t spawn(void)
>  	if (pid)
>  		return pid;
>  
> -	while(1);
> +	while(1)
>  		sleep(5);

looks like it caught a real bug here.


>  		case K_UNTAB:
> -			if (nd != NULL)
> +			if (nd != NULL) {
>  				nd = rb_next(nd);
>  				if (nd == NULL)
>  					nd = rb_first(&browser->entries);
> -			else
> +			} else
>  				nd = browser->curr_hot;
>  			break;

That looks like a real bug as well AFAICS.

>  		case K_F1:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index e4b173dec4b9..c900b664ab8f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int perf_pmu__parse_unit(struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, char *dir, char *n
>  	if (fd == -1)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -		sret = read(fd, alias->unit, UNIT_MAX_LEN);
> +	sret = read(fd, alias->unit, UNIT_MAX_LEN);
>  	if (sret < 0)
>  		goto error;

This is just whitespace noise, but annoying.

Cool compiler feature.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ