linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC 11/16] perf top: Implement basic parallel processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151214093519.GA25994@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:35:19 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 11/16] perf top: Implement basic parallel processing

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:23:43AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:53:30PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> >  
> > -	perf_top__mmap_read(top);
> > -
> >  	ret = -1;
> > -	if (pthread_create(&thread, NULL, (use_browser > 0 ? display_thread_tui :
> > -							    display_thread), top)) {
> > -		ui__error("Could not create display thread.\n");
> > +	readers = calloc(sizeof(pthread_t), top->evlist->nr_mmaps);
> > +	if (readers == NULL)
> >  		goto out_delete;
> > -	}
> >  
> > -	if (top->realtime_prio) {
> > -		struct sched_param param;
> > +	rargs = calloc(sizeof(*rargs), top->evlist->nr_mmaps);
> > +	if (rargs == NULL)
> > +		goto out_free;
> >  
> > -		param.sched_priority = top->realtime_prio;
> > -		if (sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_FIFO, &param)) {
> > -			ui__error("Could not set realtime priority.\n");
> > -			goto out_join;
> > -		}
> > +	hists = calloc(sizeof(*hists), top->evlist->nr_mmaps * top->evlist->nr_entries);
> > +	if (hists == NULL)
> > +		goto out_free;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < top->evlist->nr_mmaps * top->evlist->nr_entries; i++)
> > +		__hists__init(&hists[i]);
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < top->evlist->nr_mmaps; i++) {
> > +		struct reader_arg *rarg = &rargs[i];
> > +
> > +		rarg->idx = i;
> > +		rarg->top = top;
> > +		rarg->hists = &hists[i * top->evlist->nr_entries];
> > +
> > +		perf_top__mmap_read(rarg);
> >  	}
> > +	collect_hists(top, hists);
> 
> hum, what's the reason for calling perf_top__mmap_read
> and collect_hists in here?

nah it's for initial data so ui thread has something to display right? ;-)

> 
> also calling collect_hists on hists array pointer seems wrong

still 'collect_hists(&hists[0]);' would seem more review friendly

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/