[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512141102470.4336@nanos>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:03:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:56:02AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > According to Peter Zijlstra, irq_common_data::state_use_accessors is not
> > designed for public use. Therefore make it private so that people who
> > write code accessing it directly will get blamed by sparse.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/irq.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> > index 3c1c967..0b8f273 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct irq_domain;
> > * @msi_desc: MSI descriptor
> > */
> > struct irq_common_data {
> > - unsigned int state_use_accessors;
> > + unsigned int __private state_use_accessors;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > unsigned int node;
> > #endif
> > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ enum {
> > IRQD_FORWARDED_TO_VCPU = (1 << 20),
> > };
> >
> > -#define __irqd_to_state(d) ((d)->common->state_use_accessors)
> > +#define __irqd_to_state(d) ACCESS_PRIVATE((d)->common, state_use_accessors)
> >
> > static inline bool irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(struct irq_data *d)
> > {
>
> We should probably #undef that one once we're done with it.. Thomas?
Probably.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists