linux-kernel - Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151214152508.21394030@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:25:08 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jason Newton <nevion@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant?

> So it's been quite some time since this topic was covered in any
> capacity, and it's worth asking now: does it make sense to keep this
> ancient security bit around?  Does it make a modicum of improvement to

Yes.

> Is there disagreement on my views or points?

Yes 8)

You don't really want someone racing you to set up a fake ssh service on
your system to steal all the passwords do you ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/