linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] acpi: pci: Setup MSI domain for ACPI based pci devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2013286.NCRgLU1HGi@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:29:43 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	hanjun.guo@...aro.org, tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org,
	graeme.gregory@...aro.org, dhdang@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] acpi: pci: Setup MSI domain for ACPI based pci devices

On Monday, December 14, 2015 03:13:48 PM Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 10/12/15 16:55, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > This patch introduces pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider() for irqchip
> > to register a callback, to provide a way to determine appropriate MSI
> > domain for a pci device.
> > 
> > It also introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which returns
> > the MSI domain of the specified PCI host bridge with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI
> > bus token. Then, it is assigned to pci device.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
> 
> Bjorn, Rafael,
> 
> Do you have any comment on this?
> 
> I was hoping to queue this work (and the 3 patches that depend on it)
> for 4.5, but if you don't have the bandwidth to review it, I'll postpone
> it to the following merge window.

How much time do we have to look at it before it is postponed?

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/