linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHV2 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151214222759.GF10520@pd.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:27:59 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...il.com>
Cc:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHV2 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check
 fixup tables

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:58:45AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> With this code if CONFIG_MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY isn't defined you'll get
> a compiler error that the function doesn't have a return statement,
> right?  I think we need an #else to return NULL, or to have the #ifdef
> encompass the whole function definition as it was in Tony's version.

Right, correct.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/