[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXhNXx_csPnXcSaPvgY52NN8kadvd8XG8FQ3dcMfvftOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:47:24 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 03:39 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> > Nope. My linker-fu is weak.
>>> >
>>> > Can we even depend on the linker by itself? Even if the sections were
>>> > marked --x, we can't actually use them with those permissions unless we
>>> > have protection keys.
>>> >
>>> > Do we need some special tag on the section to tell the linker to map it
>>> > as --x under some conditions and r-x for others?
>>> >
>> Why? Wouldn't --x just end up acting like r-x if PKRU is absent?
>
> An app doing --x would expect it to be unreadable. I don't think we can
> just silently turn it in to r-x.
I don't see why. After all, an app doing --x right now gets rx. An
app doing r-- still gets r-x on some systems.
--Andy
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists