[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO6TR8Wz8p3425amCjpvBu4N8qfPzeRJ7MqoEoOabsNBd_wk8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:49:51 -0700
From: Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix INT1 Exception with unregistered breakpoints
On 12/14/15, Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@...il.com> wrote:
> Please consider the attached patch.
>
> SUMMARY
>
> This patch corrects a hard lockup failure of the system kernel if the
> operating system receives a breakpoint exception at a code execution
> address which was not registered with the operating system. The patch
> allows kernel debuggers, application profiling and performance modules,
> and external debugging tools to work better together at sharing the
> breakpoint registers on the platform in a way that they do not cause
> errors and system faults, and enables the full feature set in the
> breakpoint API. If a kernel application triggers a breakpoint
> or programs one in error, this patch will catch the condition and report
> it to the system log without the operating system experiencing a system
> fault. There are several consumers of the Linux Breakpoint API and all
> of them can and sometimes do cause the condition this patch corrects.
>
Peter,
Is that the type of summary that meets the standards. I tried to be concise.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists