lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <566FE5A0.4050204@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:04:16 +0000
From:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, GregKH <greg@...ah.com>,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wsa@...-dreams.de,
	broonie@...nel.org, vz@...ia.com
CC:	afd@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] eeprom: at25: Remove in kernel API for accessing
 the EEPROM



On 08/12/15 14:05, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> The setup() callback is not used by any in kernel code. Remove it.
> Any new code which requires access to the eeprom can use the NVMEM
> API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
>   drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c | 26 --------------------------
>   include/linux/spi/eeprom.h |  2 --
>   2 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
>

This is nice, The memory_accessor users can still use the 
nvmem_device_get() by passing the nvmem provider device_name which would 
give a handle to nvmem_device.


--srini
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
> index f850ef556bcc..4732f6997289 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>
>   struct at25_data {
>   	struct spi_device	*spi;
> -	struct memory_accessor	mem;
>   	struct mutex		lock;
>   	struct spi_eeprom	chip;
>   	struct bin_attribute	bin;
> @@ -281,26 +280,6 @@ at25_bin_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>
>   /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> -/* Let in-kernel code access the eeprom data. */
> -
> -static ssize_t at25_mem_read(struct memory_accessor *mem, char *buf,
> -			 off_t offset, size_t count)
> -{
> -	struct at25_data *at25 = container_of(mem, struct at25_data, mem);
> -
> -	return at25_ee_read(at25, buf, offset, count);
> -}
> -
> -static ssize_t at25_mem_write(struct memory_accessor *mem, const char *buf,
> -			  off_t offset, size_t count)
> -{
> -	struct at25_data *at25 = container_of(mem, struct at25_data, mem);
> -
> -	return at25_ee_write(at25, buf, offset, count);
> -}
> -
> -/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> -
>   static int at25_fw_to_chip(struct device *dev, struct spi_eeprom *chip)
>   {
>   	u32 val;
> @@ -415,22 +394,17 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>   	at25->bin.attr.name = "eeprom";
>   	at25->bin.attr.mode = S_IRUSR;
>   	at25->bin.read = at25_bin_read;
> -	at25->mem.read = at25_mem_read;
>
>   	at25->bin.size = at25->chip.byte_len;
>   	if (!(chip.flags & EE_READONLY)) {
>   		at25->bin.write = at25_bin_write;
>   		at25->bin.attr.mode |= S_IWUSR;
> -		at25->mem.write = at25_mem_write;
>   	}
>
>   	err = sysfs_create_bin_file(&spi->dev.kobj, &at25->bin);
>   	if (err)
>   		return err;
>
> -	if (chip.setup)
> -		chip.setup(&at25->mem, chip.context);
> -
>   	dev_info(&spi->dev, "%Zd %s %s eeprom%s, pagesize %u\n",
>   		(at25->bin.size < 1024)
>   			? at25->bin.size
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/eeprom.h b/include/linux/spi/eeprom.h
> index 403e007aef68..e34e169f9dcb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/eeprom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/eeprom.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ struct spi_eeprom {
>   	 */
>   #define EE_INSTR_BIT3_IS_ADDR	0x0010
>
> -	/* for exporting this chip's data to other kernel code */
> -	void (*setup)(struct memory_accessor *mem, void *context);
>   	void *context;
>   };
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ