[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <566FF0AC.7090200@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:51:24 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: GregKH <greg@...ah.com>, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
wsa@...-dreams.de, broonie@...nel.org, vz@...ia.com, afd@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agust@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] eeprom: 93xx46: extend driver to plug into the NVMEM
framework
On 15/12/15 10:37, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:26:47AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> + adding Anatolij
>>
>> On 15/12/15 10:17, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> Is there a reason for this driver to be using the old style?
>>>> I can understand the issues with at24/at25 but does this driver also
>>>> suffer from such issues?
>>>
>>> In order to keep backwards compatibility, we need the older file in
>>> /sys. The only other option is to remove it and see if anybody
>>> complains about us breaking the ABI.
>> We should atleast attempt to pitch in this direction, and ask if
>> somebody really cares if the location of the eeprom/nvmem file
>> matters to them?
>
> I expect it does matter.
>
> This driver does not implement the in kernel API for accessing the
> EEPROM. That means all users are in user space. And if this file
> moves, it seems very likely these user space users break.
We have no choice I guess, other than adding the NEMEM_COMPAT flag to
this driver too :-)
>
> Andrew
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists