[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5D9_G_agDAuYg7JdE_9+2en2soPvBb41sA8_1_YQ3PLFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:44:00 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Bai Ping <b51503@...escale.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx: Fix the assigned-clock mismatch issue on imx6q/dl
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Bai Ping <b51503@...escale.com> wrote:
>> It seems that even after this patch we still have a mismatch:
>> assigned-clocks has 5 members and assigned-clock-parents has 4.
>
> I think if it is the last clock in the assigned-clock list, the
> corresponding
> 'assigned-clock-parents' and 'assigned-clock-rates' entry can be omitted.
Yes, you are right. Confirmed with
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt and your
patch is correct, thanks:
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists