[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYKqWLZsEiSqoVxVikZ2RPToVHpmASoFPZmBnh0X_Qrcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:15:51 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: pxa: change the interrupt management
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> wrote:
> The interrupt management is changed by this patch to rely on chip data
> instead of chained interrupts.
>
> The main goal is to loosen the dependency on the global pxa chip
> structure in favor of the passed chip data. The secondary goal is to
> better show in /proc/interrupts the difference between interrupts for
> gpio0 and gpio1 (directly wired to interrupt controller), and the other
> gpios (wired onto a third line in the interrupt controller).
>
> The last advantage of this patch is that the interrupt is actually
> requested, so that another driver cannot steal this line, or overwrite
> the handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> ---
> Since v1: moved CONFIG_OF for pxa_irq_domain_ops
I already merged v1 and I don't like to rebase my tree,
can you send an incremental patch fixing this, based off
my "devel" branch?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists