lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:52:45 -0200
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
To:	Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Cc:	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 1/2] media: v4l: ti-vpe: Add CAL v4l2 camera capture
 driver

Em Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:16:33 -0600
Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> escreveu:

> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com> wrote on Thu [2015-Dec-03 11:19:22 -0200]:
> > Em Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:47:11 -0600
> > Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> escreveu:
> > 
> > > The Camera Adaptation Layer (CAL) is a block which consists of a dual
> > > port CSI2/MIPI camera capture engine.
> > > Port #0 can handle CSI2 camera connected to up to 4 data lanes.
> > > Port #1 can handle CSI2 camera connected to up to 2 data lanes.
> > > The driver implements the required API/ioctls to be V4L2 compliant.
> > > Driver supports the following:
> > >     - V4L2 API using DMABUF/MMAP buffer access based on videobuf2 api
> > >     - Asynchronous sensor sub device registration
> > 
> > Please see the comments I did for the git pull request. Additionally,
> > see below.
> 
> Yes I'll take care of the comments about the MAINTAINERS mods and patch order.
> 
> However I do have a few question on your comments, see below.

(removed the code that was already agreed or that Hans commented)

> > > 
> > > +/* register field read/write helpers */
> > > +static inline int get_field(u32 value, u32 mask, int shift)
> > > +{
> > > +	return (value & (mask << shift)) >> shift;
> > > +}
> > 
> > Please use the macros defined at bitmap.h instead of writing your own
> > version of it.
> 
> Not exactly sure what you meant here. 
> 
> Did you mean bitops.h instead as in change read_field() and write_field()
> to use __ffs or something like that?
> 
> If that is the case then I would have to change all of the bit mask and shift
> macros in cal_regs.h before I do that I want to make sure we are on the same
> page.

Yes, i mean include/linux/bitops.h.

There are several things that you dould use to simplify it using some
definitions there (and not only __ffs).

See those macros, for example:

#define BIT_MASK(nr)		(1UL << ((nr) % BITS_PER_LONG))

/*
 * Create a contiguous bitmask starting at bit position @l and ending at
 * position @h. For example
 * GENMASK_ULL(39, 21) gives us the 64bit vector 0x000000ffffe00000.
 */
#define GENMASK(h, l) \
	(((~0UL) << (l)) & (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))

#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l) \
	(((~0ULL) << (l)) & (~0ULL >> (BITS_PER_LONG_LONG - 1 - (h))))

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ