lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:15:18 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>, wim@...ana.be
Cc:	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: dw_wdt: fix signedness bug in
 dw_wdt_top_in_seconds()

On 12/15/2015 06:25 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On 64bit platforms, "(1 << (16 + top)) / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk)" is
> sign-extended to 64bit then converted to unsigned 64bit, finally divide
> the clk rate. If the top is the maximum TOP i.e 15, "(1 << (16 +15))"
> will be sign-extended to 0xffffffff80000000, then converted to unsigned
> 0xffffffff80000000, which is a huge number, thus the final result is
> wrong.
>
> We fix this issue by giving usigned value(1U in this case) at first.
>
> Let's assume clk rate is 25MHZ,
> Before the patch:
> dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(15) = -864612050
>
> After the patch:
> dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(15) = 85
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>

Nice catch.

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

> ---
>   drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index 6ea0634..8fefa4ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline int dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(unsigned top)
>   	 * There are 16 possible timeout values in 0..15 where the number of
>   	 * cycles is 2 ^ (16 + i) and the watchdog counts down.
>   	 */
> -	return (1 << (16 + top)) / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk);
> +	return (1U << (16 + top)) / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk);
>   }
>
>   static int dw_wdt_get_top(void)
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists