lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:38:34 +0100
From:	Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
To:	Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>, dledford@...hat.com
Cc:	sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
	haggaie@...lanox.com, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
	matanb@...lanox.com, doront@...lanox.com, david.ahern@...cle.com,
	erezsh@...lanox.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] infiniband:core:Add needed error path in
 cm_init_av_by_path



On 12/15/2015 04:52 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This adds a needed error path in the function, cm_init_av_by_path
> after the call to ib_init_ah_from_path in order to avoid incorrectly
> accessing the path pointer of structure type ib_sa_path_rec if this
> function call fails to complete its intended work successfully by
> returning a error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
> index 0a26dd6..e9b36ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
> @@ -383,8 +383,11 @@ static int cm_init_av_by_path(struct ib_sa_path_rec *path, struct cm_av *av)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	av->port = port;
> -	ib_init_ah_from_path(cm_dev->ib_device, port->port_num, path,
> -			     &av->ah_attr);
> +	ret = ib_init_ah_from_path(cm_dev->ib_device, port->port_num, path,
> +				   &av->ah_attr);

..Just wondering what if the transport don't require GRH?
eg inside the same subnet?

The hop_limit is only suggest that the package allowed to be
routed, not have to, correct?

Regards,
Michael Wang

> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	av->timeout = path->packet_life_time + 1;
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ