| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:48:37 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: do more integrity verification for superblock
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:56 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: do more integrity verification for superblock
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> I also got superblock failure.
> It seems that your patch doesn't handle correctly if segment0_blkaddr is not
> zero.
> Please see below.
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:09:23PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Do more sanity check for superblock during ->mount.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 5434186..624fc2c 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -926,6 +926,79 @@ static loff_t max_file_size(unsigned bits)
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool sanity_check_area_boundary(struct super_block *sb,
> > + struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super)
> > +{
> > + u32 segment0_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment0_blkaddr);
> > + u32 cp_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->cp_blkaddr);
> > + u32 sit_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->sit_blkaddr);
> > + u32 nat_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->nat_blkaddr);
> > + u32 ssa_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->ssa_blkaddr);
> > + u32 main_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->main_blkaddr);
> > + u32 segment_count_ckpt = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_ckpt);
> > + u32 segment_count_sit = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_sit);
> > + u32 segment_count_nat = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_nat);
> > + u32 segment_count_ssa = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_ssa);
> > + u32 segment_count_main = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_main);
> > + u32 segment_count = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count);
> > + u32 log_blocks_per_seg = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg);
> > +
> > + if (segment0_blkaddr != cp_blkaddr) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Mismatch start address, segment0(%u) cp_blkaddr(%u)",
> > + segment0_blkaddr, cp_blkaddr);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (cp_blkaddr + (segment_count_ckpt << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
> > + sit_blkaddr) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Wrong CP boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)",
> > + cp_blkaddr, sit_blkaddr,
> > + segment_count_ckpt << log_blocks_per_seg);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (sit_blkaddr + (segment_count_sit << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
> > + nat_blkaddr) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Wrong SIT boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)",
> > + sit_blkaddr, nat_blkaddr,
> > + segment_count_sit << log_blocks_per_seg);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (nat_blkaddr + (segment_count_nat << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
> > + ssa_blkaddr) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Wrong NAT boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)",
> > + nat_blkaddr, ssa_blkaddr,
> > + segment_count_nat << log_blocks_per_seg);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ssa_blkaddr + (segment_count_ssa << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
> > + main_blkaddr) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Wrong SSA boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)",
> > + ssa_blkaddr, main_blkaddr,
> > + segment_count_ssa << log_blocks_per_seg);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (main_blkaddr + (segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
> > + (segment_count + 1) << log_blocks_per_seg) {
Oh, zone aligned start offset 'segment0_blkaddr' was calculated based on zone
size, sector size, total sectors. So here it's wrong to use constant '1'.
Sorry for my mistake.
Thanks for your explanation below! :) I will resend the v2 patch.
Thanks,
>
> This should be
> segment_count << log_blocks_per_seg + segment0_blkaddr) {
>
>
> =========================================================================
> '- main_blkaddr
> `- segment0_blkaddr
> |-------------- segment_count_main ----------|
>
> |-------------------------- segment_count --------------------------|
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Wrong MAIN_AREA boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)",
> > + main_blkaddr,
> > + (segment_count + 1) << log_blocks_per_seg,
> > + segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct super_block *sb,
> > struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super)
> > {
> > @@ -955,6 +1028,14 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct super_block *sb,
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > + /* check log blocks per segment */
> > + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg) != 9) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Invalid log blocks per segment (%u)\n",
> > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg));
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Currently, support 512/1024/2048/4096 bytes sector size */
> > if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_sectorsize) >
> > F2FS_MAX_LOG_SECTOR_SIZE ||
> > @@ -973,6 +1054,23 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct super_block *sb,
> > le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_sectorsize));
> > return 1;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* check reserved ino info */
> > + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->node_ino) != 1 ||
> > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->meta_ino) != 2 ||
> > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->root_ino) != 3) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
> > + "Invalid Fs Meta Ino: node(%u) meta(%u) root(%u)",
> > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->node_ino),
> > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->meta_ino),
> > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->root_ino));
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* check CP/SIT/NAT/SSA/MAIN_AREA area boundary */
> > + if (sanity_check_area_boundary(sb, raw_super))
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.6.3
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists