lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450203011.4142.4.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:10:11 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements
 in six functions

On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 20:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:02:31AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > This is the original code:
> > 
> > 	result = foo();
> > 	if (result)
> > 		goto label;
> > 
> > 	result = bar();
> > 	if (result)
> > 		goto label;
> > 
> > 	result = baz();
> > 	if (result)
> > 		goto label;
> > 
> > label:
> > 	go on...
> > 
> 
> No.  There is no test.  The original code looks like:
> 
> 	result = foo();
> 	if (result)
> 		goto out;
> 	result = baz();
> 	goto out;
> out:
> 	go on..
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

Here is the original code:
---------------------
	/* Copy hsm_progress struct */
	req_hpk = req_capsule_client_get(&req->rq_pill, &RMF_MDS_HSM_PROGRESS);
	if (req_hpk == NULL) {
		rc = -EPROTO;
		goto out;
	}

	*req_hpk = *hpk;
	req_hpk->hpk_errval = lustre_errno_hton(hpk->hpk_errval);

	ptlrpc_request_set_replen(req);

	rc = mdc_queue_wait(req);
	goto out;
out:
	ptlrpc_req_finished(req);
	return rc;
}
---------------------

I think if the last goto out; is to be removed,
then it should be replaced by a blank line.

It separates the last operation block from the return.

cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ