linux-kernel - Re: 4.4-rc5: ugly warn on: 5 W+X pages found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151215183004.GI25973@pd.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:30:05 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 4.4-rc5: ugly warn on: 5 W+X pages found

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:45:40AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> >
> > I tried applying:
> >
> > [PATCH 1/2] x86_32/mm: Set NX in __supported_pte_mask before enabling
> > paging
> >
> > but I still get
> >
> > [    2.691897] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address ffe69000/0xffe69000
> 
> This may be an insane suggestion, but how about we try to detect when
> that entry gets set, rather than after the fact.
> 
> Something really brute-force like
> 
>   diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>   index 6ec0c8b2e9df..538c9bb239b9 100644
>   --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>   +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>   @@ -337,6 +337,13 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_clear_soft_dirty(pmd_t pmd)
> 
>    #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY */
> 
>   +static inline int kernel_write_execute_prot(pgprotval_t protval)
>   +{
>   +       return !(protval & _PAGE_USER) &&
>   +               !(protval & _PAGE_NX) &&

Shouldn't this be without a "!"? AFAIU, we want _PAGE_NX | _PAGE_RW?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/