[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56707B1D.10807@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:42:05 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
arnd@...db.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer: improve
performance a bit
On 11/25/2015 05:01 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> These two patches try to improve the dw_apb_timer clocksource/clockevent
> performance.
>
> These patches depend on the apbt_readl return value fix patch:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-November/388250.html
>
> since v3:
> - fix commit msg: we measured 4096 rounds of function call. So add this
> information into commit msg to avoid confusion.
>
> since v2:
> - only use relaxed version in critical path
> - inline apbt_readl/apbt_writel
> - add some performance numbers
>
> since v1:
> - correct the wrong sentence in commit msg about writel performance on
> CA9 with outer L2 cache. Thank Arnd for pointing out this in another
> thread.
>
>
> Jisheng Zhang (2):
> clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer: Inline apbt_readl and apbt_writel
> clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer: Use {readl|writel}_relaxed in
> critical path
>
> drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Applied.
Thanks !
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists