[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1450220850-31632-1-git-send-email-brad.mouring@ni.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:07:30 -0600
From: bmouring@...com
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] rtmutex: Use chainwalking control enum
In 8930ed80 (rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic),
chainwalking control enums were introduced to limit the deadlock
detection logic. One of the calls to task_blocks_on_rt_mutex was
missed when converting to use the enums.
Signed-off-by: Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@...com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 2026759..e0b0d9b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ static void noinline __sched rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
__set_current_state_no_track(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
pi_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, self, 0);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, self, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
BUG_ON(ret);
for (;;) {
--
2.6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists