[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151216093340.GD8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:33:40 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/pistachio: Fix wrong calculated
clocksource read value
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >And in fact, clocksource_mmio_readw_down() also has similar issue, but it masks
> >with c->mask before return, the c->mask is less than 32 bit (because the
> >clocksource_mmio_init think number of valid bits > 32 or < 16 is invalid.)
> >the higher 32 bits are masked off, so we never saw such issue. But we'd better
> >to fix that, what's your opinion?
>
> I think we should have a look to this portion closely.
There is no need to return more bits than are specified. If you have
a N-bit counter, then the high (64-N)-bits can be any value, because:
static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
{
return (now - last) & mask;
}
where 'now' is the current value returned from the clock source read
function, 'last' is a previously returned value, and 'mask' is the
bit mask. This has the effect of ignoring the high order bits.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists