[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1512161156290.25787@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:58:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch
modules
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Jessica Yu wrote:
> @@ -3530,6 +3614,16 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
> if (err < 0)
> goto bug_cleanup;
>
> + /*
> + * Save sechdrs, indices, and other data from info
> + * in order to patch to-be-loaded modules.
> + * Do not call free_copy() for livepatch modules.
> + */
> + if (mod->klp)
> + err = copy_module_elf(mod, info);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto bug_cleanup;
> +
I think goto bug_cleanup is not sufficient. Just before this hunk sysfs is
created. So in case of error here we should call mod_sysfs_teardown() or
something before going to bug_cleanup. That is new error label is needed
before bug_cleanup. Correct?
Miroslav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists