lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151216132357.GK5727@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:23:57 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Add builtin_spi_driver() to avoid registration
 boilerplate

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 03:53:57PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> Here we use that support and extend it to SPI driver registration, so where
> a driver is clearly non-modular and builtin-only, we can register it in a
> similar fashion.  Existing code that is clearly non-modular can be updated
> with the simple mapping of

>   module_spi_driver(...)  ---> builtin_spi_driver(...)

> We've essentially cloned the former to make the latter, and taken out the
> remove/module_exit parts since those never get used in a non-modular build
> of the code.

Why would it be sensible to have a SPI driver that can't be built as a
module?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ