[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1450278993-12664-17-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:16:26 +0100
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
To: bhelgaas@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com, okaya@...eaurora.org,
jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com
Cc: robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
wangyijing@...wei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
msalter@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
jchandra@...adcom.com, jcm@...hat.com,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 16/23] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation.
Arches in subject are the only one who use pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks
and implement it in the same way. Moreover ARM64 is going to do the same.
So it seams that acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus is generic enough to be default
option for pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks. Also, it is always safe to run
acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus as they have empty stubs for !ACPI case and
return if ACPI has been switched off in run time.
After all we can remove x86 and ia64 pcibios_{add|remove}_bus
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
---
arch/ia64/pci/pci.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/pci/common.c | 10 ----------
drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
index fe96bc9..c1e8ed5 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
@@ -357,16 +357,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
platform_pci_fixup_bus(b);
}
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
void pcibios_set_master (struct pci_dev *dev)
{
/* No special bus mastering setup handling */
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
index eccd4d9..ed3236d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
@@ -171,16 +171,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
pcibios_fixup_device_resources(dev);
}
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
/*
* Only use DMI information to set this if nothing was passed
* on the kernel command line (which was parsed earlier).
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index cad836f..2fbf840 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
#include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
#include <linux/aer.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
@@ -2067,10 +2068,12 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
+ acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
}
void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
+ acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
}
struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists