linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:27:53 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>
Cc:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver

2015-12-16 10:11 GMT+09:00 Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:53:31PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> >>> What motivated the location of this power domain driver in
>> >>> arch/arm/mach-bcm? Should not we have this in drivers/power/ or
>> >>> somewhere in drivers/ at the very least?
>> >>
>> >> ls stronly suggests that power contains drivers for power supplies and
>> >> batteries, not power domains.
>
> Indeed it's used for fuel gauges and chargers, but also for
> reboot/powerdown and adaptive voltage scaling, so another
> subdirectory for power-domains wouldn't be that odd.
>
>> >> There are 6 power domain drivers in
>> >> arch/arm, 3 in drivers/clk, and 3 in drivers/soc.
>> >
>> > If we ever have to support a different architecture which happens to use
>> > a similar power domain, then we want it to be in a location which makes
>> > it easy for sharing it in the first place. As it stands today, it does
>> > not seem useful to me to have this code in arch/arm/mach-bcm/ at all.
>> >
>> > Maybe there is room from a drivers/power/domains/ of some kind?
>
> I like the idea, but let's include generic power domain maintainers
> in this discussion, as I suggested here (I got a power domain driver
> patch for drivers/power just a few days ago):
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/815
>
> Also somebody would have to step up to maintain that directory.

This could go into drivers/soc. We put there a lot of mach-specific
stuff which we want to make a little more generic (like generic enough
multiplatform, multiarchitecture etc). Rockchip has its own power
domains there. Dove and Mediatek seem as well but I am not sure. Some
other architectures keep this still in arm/mach (exynos, ux500, zx,
imx, s34c64xx, shmobile) but this looks more of like a legacy choice.

However, since generic power domains have its own maintainers entry
and reside under drivers/base/power, maybe making a separate directory
for power domains drivers makes sense?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/