linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 128/128] sched/wait: Fix signal handling in bit wait helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151216175730.GA8605@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:57:30 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mark.rutland@....com,
	neilb@...e.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 128/128] sched/wait: Fix signal handling in
	bit wait helpers

On 12/16, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
>
> 3.19.8-ckt12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
>
> commit 68985633bccb6066bf1803e316fbc6c1f5b796d6 upstream.

Please note that this patch is wrong without the next fix from Peter.

And in fact to me it is still not clear whether we really want to do
this, this probably needs more investigation.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/