lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1450287568-19808-28-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:37:47 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 027/128] xhci: Fix a race in usb2 LPM resume, blocking U3 for usb2 devices

3.19.8-ckt12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>

commit dad67d5f3d0efe01d38c6cebcb6698280e51927b upstream.

Clear device initiated resume variables once device is fully up and running
in U0 state.

Resume needs to be signaled for 20ms for usb2 devices before they can be
moved to U0 state.

An interrupt is triggered if a device initiates resume. As we handle the
event in interrupt context we can not sleep for 20ms, so we instead set
a resume flag, a timestamp, and start the roothub polling.

The roothub code will later move the port to U0 when it finds a port in
resume state with the resume flag set, and timestamp passed by 20ms.

A host initiated resume is however not done in interrupt context, and
host initiated resume code will directly signal resume, wait 20ms and then
move the port to U0.

These two codepaths can race, if we are in the middle of a host initated
resume, while sleeping for 20ms, we may handle a port event and find the
port in resume state. The port event handling code will assume the resume
was device initiated and set the resume flag and timestamp.

Root hub code will however not catch the port in resume state again as the
host initated resume code has already moved the port to U0.
The resume flag and timestamp will remain set for this port preventing port
from suspending again  (LPM setting port to U3)

Fix this for now by always clearing the device initated resume parameters
once port is in U0

Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
index ee07ba4..d8b7b11 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
@@ -665,12 +665,15 @@ static u32 xhci_get_port_status(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
 			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_SUSPEND;
 		}
 	}
-	if ((raw_port_status & PORT_PLS_MASK) == XDEV_U0
-			&& (raw_port_status & PORT_POWER)
-			&& (bus_state->suspended_ports & (1 << wIndex))) {
-		bus_state->suspended_ports &= ~(1 << wIndex);
-		if (hcd->speed != HCD_USB3)
-			bus_state->port_c_suspend |= 1 << wIndex;
+	if ((raw_port_status & PORT_PLS_MASK) == XDEV_U0 &&
+	    (raw_port_status & PORT_POWER)) {
+		if (bus_state->suspended_ports & (1 << wIndex)) {
+			bus_state->suspended_ports &= ~(1 << wIndex);
+			if (hcd->speed != HCD_USB3)
+				bus_state->port_c_suspend |= 1 << wIndex;
+		}
+		bus_state->resume_done[wIndex] = 0;
+		clear_bit(wIndex, &bus_state->resuming_ports);
 	}
 	if (raw_port_status & PORT_CONNECT) {
 		status |= USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ