[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOhV88NnD9Q=BEA2QFxianmyW07n8oQEBSPoMoU+F7ZuKgsNXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:59:17 -0800
From: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues
Hi Jiri,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>
>> > [Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail settings
>> > to not use HTML.]
>> >
>> > I have recently purchased a Lenovo Yoga 900 and most everything is working
>> > with a slightly modified 4.4-rc5 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/441 applied
>> > to enable the touchpad itself), I am seeing two issues:
>> >
>> > 1) On suspend/resume, the touchpad is non-functional. A `modprobe -r i2c-hid;
>> > modprobe i2c-hid` "fixes" it.
>> >
>> > The kernel emits:
>> >
>> > i2c_hid i2c-SYNA2B29:00: failed to reset device.
>> > dpm_run_callback(): i2c_hid_resume+0x0/0xc0 [i2c_hid] returns -61
>> > PM: Device i2c-SYNA2B29:00 failed to resume: error -61
>> >
>> > During the resume. So perhaps this is a timing issue (given that once
>> > resumed, the
>> > module reload does work?).
>>
>> Linus noticed this as well and Jiri suggested the below patch which
>> seemed to fix the issue (although it increased resume time a bit).
>>
>> I was supposed to get one Lenovo Yoga 900 here to debug this issue but
>> I'm still waiting for it (sloow big corporation bureaucracy takes some
>> time to get things purchased outside).
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
>> index 55d8f9d..52dd03a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
>> @@ -1121,10 +1121,16 @@ static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev)
>> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> struct i2c_hid *ihid = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> struct hid_device *hid = ihid->hid;
>> - int wake_status;
>> + int wake_status, tries = 3;
>>
>> enable_irq(ihid->irq);
>> - ret = i2c_hid_hwreset(client);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + ret = i2c_hid_hwreset(client);
>> + if (ret)
>> + msleep(1000);
>> + } while (tries-- > 0 && ret);
>> +
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>
> As a possible alternative, please test the patch above on top of for-next
> branch of
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid.git
>
> It contains 64bebefcf3 ("HID: enable hid device to suspend/resume
> asynchronously") and knowing whether that changes something might be
> interesting datapoint as well.
What should I be looking for to be different wrt. that tree? Should I
not see the failure to reset the device? Or would it be (relatively)
speedier than the stock kernel?
Thanks,
Nish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists