linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] lpfc: Add lockdep assertions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:19:38 +0100
From:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To:	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
	Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] lpfc: Add lockdep assertions

On 11/20/2015 01:37 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Several functions in lpfc have comments stating that the function must be
> called with the hbalock (or hostlock, or ringlock) held. Add
> lockdep_assert_held() annotations to these functions, so one can actually
> verify the locks are held.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> @@ -2647,6 +2675,7 @@ lpfc_sli_iocbq_lookup(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
>   {
>   	struct lpfc_iocbq *cmd_iocb = NULL;
>   	uint16_t iotag;
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&phba->hbalock);
>
>   	iotag = prspiocb->iocb.ulpIoTag;

(replying to an e-mail of one month ago)

Please leave a blank line after declarations. Checkpatch should have 
reported this. Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/