linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Raspberry Pi 2 support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3363412.hB2NWDcUxf@wuerfel>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:26:35 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Raspberry Pi 2 support.

On Thursday 17 December 2015 09:48:57 Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 17.12.2015 um 01:37 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> >
> >> On Wednesday 16 December 2015 15:55:07 Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>> This is a major rewrite of the previous Raspberry Pi 2 submission.
> >>> SMP support is now included, and the DT includes are cleaned up to
> >>> avoid massive duplication.
> >>>
> >>> The branch (based on 4.4-rc5, to get the USB regression fixes) can be
> >>> found at:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/anholt/linux/tree/bcm2836-4.4
> >> Looks all good to me, but when we get the pull request, I'd strongly
> >> prefer to have that based on -rc3 or earlier.
> >>
> >> What commit is the USB regression fix you refer to above? Is that in a
> >> branch that is -rc3 based? Maybe you can rebase the changes on top
> >> of that branch, to minimize the amount of backmerges?
> > Top 4 commits of drivers/usb/dwc2 for 4.4-rc5 (possibly not all of them
> > are required, but it's what I've been using).  
> >
> 
> Unfortunately all 4 of them are required:
> 
> d0464bcf12af ("usb: dwc2: Make PHY optional")
> 
> 6c2dad69163f ("usb: dwc2: Return errors from PHY")
> 
> 8aa90cf2a286 ("usb: dwc2: make otg clk optional")
> 
> f74875dc3613 ("usb: dwc2: fix kernel oops during driver probe")

Ok, that's good. They are all based on -rc1, so you you can just rebase
on top of f74875dc3613, which was pulled by GregKH.

> But they should apply to -rc3 too.

Please don't rebase them, use the commits that got merged, otherwise we'd
get duplicate commits and that would be worse than the backmerge.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/