linux-kernel - [PATCH] virtio_ring: use smp_store

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1450347932-16325-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:32:53 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_ring: use smp_store_mb

We need a full barrier after writing out event index, using smp_store_mb
there seems better than open-coding.
As usual, we need a wrapper to account for strong barriers/non smp.

It's tempting to use this in vhost as well, for that, we'll
need a variant of smp_store_mb that works on __user pointers.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---

Seems to give a speedup on my box but I'm less sure about this one.  E.g. as
xchng faster than mfence on all/most intel CPUs? Anyone has an opinion?

 include/linux/virtio_ring.h  | 14 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 15 +++++++++------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
index 0135c16..8912189 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
@@ -47,6 +47,20 @@ static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers)
 		wmb();
 }
 
+static inline void virtio_store_mb(bool weak_barriers,
+				   __virtio16 *p, __virtio16 v)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	if (weak_barriers)
+		smp_store_mb(*p, v);
+	else
+#endif
+	{
+		WRITE_ONCE(*p, v);
+		mb();
+	}
+}
+
 static inline __virtio16 virtio_load_acquire(bool weak_barriers, __virtio16 *p)
 {
 	if (!weak_barriers) {
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index f822cab..b0aea67 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -517,10 +517,10 @@ void *virtqueue_get_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned int *len)
 	/* If we expect an interrupt for the next entry, tell host
 	 * by writing event index and flush out the write before
 	 * the read in the next get_buf call. */
-	if (!(vq->avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) {
-		vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->last_used_idx);
-		virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
-	}
+	if (!(vq->avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT))
+		virtio_store_mb(vq->weak_barriers,
+				&vring_used_event(&vq->vring),
+				cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->last_used_idx));
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
 	vq->last_add_time_valid = false;
@@ -653,8 +653,11 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
 	}
 	/* TODO: tune this threshold */
 	bufs = (u16)(vq->avail_idx_shadow - vq->last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
-	vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->last_used_idx + bufs);
-	virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
+
+	virtio_store_mb(vq->weak_barriers,
+			&vring_used_event(&vq->vring),
+			cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->last_used_idx + bufs));
+
 	if (unlikely((u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, vq->vring.used->idx) - vq->last_used_idx) > bufs)) {
 		END_USE(vq);
 		return false;
-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/