linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:54:20 +0100
From:	Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@....de>
To:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
CC:	Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@....de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, <wni@...dia.com>,
	<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:48:08PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:11:24 +0100, Andreas Werner wrote:
> > here is the register dump of the tmp461.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > It seemse that we really cannot detect if it is a tmp461 or a tmp451.
> > Also the magic "ID Register" offset 0xff is 0x00 for both devices.
> 
> I would use register 0x16, which doesn't exist but reads 0x00 on the
> TMP451. It could in theory also read 0x00 on the TMP461 but only if
> both channels are disabled, which makes little sense. More likely at
> least one channel will be enabled so you'll have value 0x01-0x03 if
> this is a TMP461.
>

Yes you are right. Both channels are enabled during POR, so the chance
to have a 0x00 as in the TMP451 will be very low.
 
> -- 
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/