[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151217162613.GH3729@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:26:13 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for
livepatch modules
On Mon 2015-11-30 23:21:15, Jessica Yu wrote:
> For livepatch modules, copy Elf section, symbol, and string information
> from the load_info struct in the module loader.
>
> Livepatch uses special relocation sections in order to be able to patch
> modules that are not yet loaded, as well as apply patches to the kernel
> when the addresses of symbols cannot be determined at compile time (for
> example, when kaslr is enabled). Livepatch modules must preserve Elf
> information such as section indices in order to apply the remaining
> relocation sections at the appropriate time (i.e. when the target module
> loads).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/module.h | 9 +++++
> kernel/module.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 3a19c79..9b46256 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -425,6 +425,14 @@ struct module {
>
> /* Notes attributes */
> struct module_notes_attrs *notes_attrs;
> +
> + /* Elf information (optionally saved) */
> + Elf_Ehdr *hdr;
> + Elf_Shdr *sechdrs;
> + char *secstrings;
> + struct {
> + unsigned int sym, str, mod, vers, info, pcpu;
> + } index;
> #endif
I would hide this into a structure. It is 3 pointers and 6 integers
that are mostly unused. I think about using a pointer to struct load_info
here. We could set the unused stuff to zero and NULL.
Any better idea how to share the definition with struct load_info
is welcome.
Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists