[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h1yhyqxdyLka2X56Q5QhCoXY3vALFBdm0gdQdYR6Vr8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:48:09 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: -next regression: "driver cohandle -EPROBE_DEFER from bus_type.match()"
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> The commit below causes the libnvdimm sub-system to stop loading.
> This is due to the fact that nvdimm_bus_match() returns the result of
> test_bit() which may be negative. If there are any other bus match
> functions using test_bit they may be similarly impacted.
>
> Can we queue a fixup like the following to libnvdimm, and maybe
> others, ahead of this driver core change?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
> index 7e2c43f701bc..2b2181cdeb63 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int nvdimm_bus_match(struct device *dev,
> struct device_driver *drv)
> {
> struct nd_device_driver *nd_drv = to_nd_device_driver(drv);
>
> - return test_bit(to_nd_device_type(dev), &nd_drv->type);
> + return !!test_bit(to_nd_device_type(dev), &nd_drv->type);
> }
>
> static struct module *to_bus_provider(struct device *dev)
>
>
>
>
> Other ideas?
How about just checking for EPROBE_DEFER, every other non-zero value is success.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists