linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: Fix ordering of node initialisation in osq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151217193334.GJ6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:33:34 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: Fix ordering of node initialisation in
 osq_lock

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:04:00AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please consider this patch for 4.4.
> 
> No problem, but just wanted to check that there's nothing else pending
> in any locking tree?

Just this one patch for now.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/