linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/13] Make the x86 bitops like test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA9_cmcW_82+j6kBXU4-70hqDL=m45WD_ukD52eGNiEyBWX_+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:38:17 -0800
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] Make the x86 bitops like test_bit() return bool

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:21 PM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Make the x86 bitop functions like test_bit() return bool rather than an
> integer.  This permits gcc-5 to make better choices and can reduce the code
> size overall and allows some warnings to be evaded.

This also would have prevented this regression in -next:

https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-December/003557.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/