linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: use timeout diff when timeout is updated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151217141805.f418cf9b137da08656504001@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:18:05 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com, atomlin@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: use timeout diff when timeout is
 updated

On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:23:03 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:

> >From 529ff00b556e110c6e801c39e94b06f559307136 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:27:08 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: use timeout diff when timeout is updated
> 
> When new timeout is written to /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs,
> khungtaskd is interrupted and again sleeps for full timeout duration.
> 
> This means that hang task will not be checked if new timeout is written
> periodically within old timeout duration and/or checking of hang task
> will be delayed for up to previous timeout duration.
> Fix this by remembering last time khungtaskd checked hang task.
> 
> This change will allow other watchdog tasks (if any) to share khungtaskd
> by sleeping for minimal timeout diff of all watchdog tasks. Doing more
> watchdog tasks from khungtaskd will reduce the possibility of printk()
> collisions by multiple watchdog threads.

This seems like reasonable behaviour, but it is a
non-backward-compatible change.  I don't know how important that is -
probably "not very".

Please let's fully describe this behaviour in the documentation. 
Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt.

It appears that if userspace writes a new timeout which has already
expired, a check is triggered immediately, correct?  Let's ensure that
this is documented as well.   And tested!

And it would be helpful to add a comment to hung_timeout_jiffies()
which describes the behaviour and explains the reasons for it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/