[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5673E293.8080803@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:40:19 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances
On 18/12/15 09:44, Linus Walleij wrote:
> There is currently a hack in the GIC driver making it possible
> to pass the number of GIC instances from the platform-specific
> include files and thus override the variable MAX_GIC_NR.
>
> With multiplatform deployments, this will not work as we need
> to get rid of the platform-specific include files.
>
> It turns out that this feature is only used by the RealView
> platform which has a cascaded GIC. So move the configuration
> to Kconfig and bump to 2 instances if we're building for the
> RealView. The include file hacks can then be removed.
>
> Tested on the ARM PB11MPCore with its cascaded GIC.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Excellent, thanks Linus. I've taken the liberty of performing a small
change as outlined below:
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 4d7294e5d982..bf29a8b2b7c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ config ARM_GIC
> select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
>
> +config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
> + int
> + default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
> + default 1
> +
> config ARM_GIC_V2M
> bool
> depends on ARM_GIC
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index abf2ffaed392..006a83838857 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -99,11 +99,7 @@ static u8 gic_cpu_map[NR_GIC_CPU_IF] __read_mostly;
>
> static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
>
> -#ifndef MAX_GIC_NR
> -#define MAX_GIC_NR 1
> -#endif
> -
> -static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR] __read_mostly;
> +static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR] __read_mostly;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
> @@ -417,7 +413,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
>
> void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
> {
> - if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> + if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
> BUG();
I have replaced these statements with:
BUG_ON(gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR);
which have the same effect, and are vaguely nicer.
I've pushed it on my irq/gic-4.5 branch.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists