[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151218013906.GA1715233@devbig337.prn1.facebook.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:39:20 -0800
From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
<izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>, <linville@...driver.com>,
<dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netconsole: Initialize after all core networking drivers
On Thursday 12/17 at 17:10 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:52:39 -0800
> Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com> wrote:
>
> > With built-in netconsole and IXGBE, configuring netconsole via the kernel
> > cmdline results in the following panic at boot:
> >
> > netpoll: netconsole: device eth0 not up yet, forcing it
> > usb 2-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci
> > ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: registered PHC device on eth0
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000810
> > <snip>
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff81578661>] ? vxlan_get_rx_port+0x41/0xa0
> > [<ffffffff81586828>] ixgbe_open+0x4e8/0x540
> > [<ffffffff8168045c>] __dev_open+0xac/0x120
> > [<ffffffff81680506>] dev_open+0x36/0x70
> > [<ffffffff8169abec>] netpoll_setup+0x23c/0x300
> > [<ffffffff8169a66a>] ? netpoll_parse_options+0x19a/0x200
> > [<ffffffff81d797a8>] ? option_setup+0x1f/0x1f
> > [<ffffffff81d79882>] init_netconsole+0xda/0x262
> > [<ffffffff81d797a8>] ? option_setup+0x1f/0x1f
> > [<ffffffff810003a8>] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x1b0
> > [<ffffffff81d31144>] kernel_init_freeable+0x14a/0x1e3
> > [<ffffffff81d308f1>] ? do_early_param+0x8c/0x8c
> > [<ffffffff81778610>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
> > [<ffffffff8177861e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xe0
> > [<ffffffff8177dc5f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
> > [<ffffffff81778610>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
> >
> > This happens because IXGBE assumes that vxlan has already been initialized.
> > The cleanest way to fix this is to just initialize netconsole after all the
> > other core networking stuff has completed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
>
> Fixing this by changing Makefile order is too fragile.
> You are depending on the fact that Makefile order determines link order
> and that determines initialization order. Down that path demons lie.
Hmm, include/linux/init.h explicitly states that "Ordering inside the
subsections is determined by link order", and has since before the
beginning of the history in Git.
I agree it seems magic/scary, but as Eric says I would imagine this
behavior is relied upon in other places.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists