[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1512180723400.4908@CLUIJ>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 07:26:24 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
From: Marc Aurele La France <tsi@...oix.net>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Volth <openssh@...th.com>, Damien Miller <djm@...drot.org>
Subject: Re: n_tty: Check the other end of pty pair before returning EAGAIN
on a read()
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 05:37 AM, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
>> I am not asking to read data before it has been produced. I am puzzled
>> that despite knowing that the data exists, I can now be lied to when I
>> try to retrieve it, when I wasn't before. We are talking about what is
>> essentially a two-way pipe, not some network or serial connection with
>> transmission delays userland has long experience in dealing with.
>> These previously internal additional delays, that are now exposed to
>> userland, are simply an implementation detail that userland did not,
>> and should not, need to worry about.
>
> Your mental model is that pseudo-terminals are a synchronous pipe, which
> is not true.
>
> But this argument is pointless because the regression needs to be fixed
> regardless of the merits.
Fair enough.
Anything new on this?
Thanks.
Marc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists