linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (lib/842/842

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:08:46 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (lib/842/842_decompress)

On 12/18/15 06:32, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On 12/15/15 21:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20151215:
>>>
>>> The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>>>
>>> The i2c tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
>>>
>>> The gpio tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
>>> next-20151215.
>>>
>>
>> on i386, when CONFIG_PRINTK is not enabled:
>>
>>
>> ../lib/842/842_decompress.c: In function '__do_index':
>> ../lib/842/842_decompress.c:205:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'no_printk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>   pr_debug("index%x to %lx off %lx adjoff %lx tot %lx data %lx\n",
>>   ^
> 
> Hmm, it's not failing for me, can you send your config?

Attached.

FYI, I had 5 of these failures in 20 randconfig builds.


-- 
~Randy

View attachment "config-r7119" of type "text/plain" (84963 bytes)