[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151218184035.GF17386@linux-uzut.site>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:40:35 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH man-pages] Add membarrier system call man page
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>+.SH RETURN VALUE
>+On success, this system call returns zero. On error, \-1 is returned,
>+and
For the zero return, would it make sense to specify that it is also the case
for MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED under UP? Its pretty obvious it should be a no-op,
but wouldn't hurt to make it explicit.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists