[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5674598B.6020000@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:07:55 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] blackfin-cpufreq: Change return type of cpu_set_cclk() to
 that of clk_set_rate()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:43:27 +0100
The return type "unsigned long" was used by the cpu_set_cclk() function
while the type "int" is provided by the clk_set_rate() function.
Let us make this usage consistent.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
index a9f8e5b..2a6f3ac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BF60x
-unsigned long cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
+int cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
 {
 	struct clk *clk;
 	int ret;
-- 
2.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists